![]() ![]() Carmichael, the Supreme Court affirmed a District Court’s decision not to admit expert testimony on tire marks and treads because there was “no indication in the record that other experts in the industry use ’s particular approach or that tire experts normally make the very fine distinctions necessary to support his conclusions. (a) that the “expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue ” (b) that “the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data ” (c) that “the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods ” and (d) that “the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.” For example, in Kumho Tire Co. Our opinions follow instructions from counsel or the court. The Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702 sets out the following requirements for expert testimony to be admissible, however. (a) The affidavit required by subdivision 2, clause (2), must be signed by the partys attorney and state the identity of each person whom the attorney expects to call as an expert witness at trial to testify with respect to the issues of negligence, malpractice, or causation, the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expect. Expert witnesses provide independent opinions based on subject-matter expertise. The subject will usually be technical or scientific, such as ballistics, forensics, or medical. An opinion stated during a trial or deposition (testimony under oath before trial) by an expert witness on a subject relevant to a lawsuit or a criminal case. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |